Photo Credit: Los Angeles Times |
Second, what about parking? Will such parcels become a sea of asphalt in accommodating up to eight or more vehicles? More paved area means less impervious surface and more stormwater runoff.
Third, I can only wonder at the response of the mortgage banking, insurance, and other related markets at how this proposal might impact their industries. Now on one hand, why should sensitivity be had for industries that historically redlined neighborhoods and developed practices that promoted racial segregation? Yet much of our wealth building at the family level relates to home ownership, and any major shift could have a major impact on this key asset in a family portfolio.
Fourplex zoning isn't just saying you allowed one unit on a lot and we're merely changing the density from one to four. That is simplistic and not respectful of the range of criteria that should be considered at that density. Things such as common area, the complexities of condominium-ization that the parcels surely will have to undergo, solid waste container storage, school bus capacities, and much more. Many places, including eastern Massachusetts, are experiencing a housing crisis, but solutions need to be better formulated than this proposed legislation.
Here is the link to the article: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/livable-city/la-ol-sb50-single-family-20190424-story.html
Here is an entertaining take on the crises afflicting California
ReplyDeletehttps://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-lopez-los-angeles-traffic-housing-20190522-story.html